Public vs. Not Public: A Practical Interpretation of “Public and Common Use” in Fair Housing Compliance

A professional perspective shaped by years of reviewing and inspecting Fair Housing Act projects

Multifamily housing development under construction with multiple three- and four-story residential buildings overlooking a retention pond.

When people talk about Fair Housing Act compliance, they often jump straight to the seven technical requirements inside covered dwelling units. While those requirements matter, many projects run into challenges long before anyone measures a threshold or checks a bathroom layout. One of the most overlooked and often misunderstood parts of Fair Housing Review happens at the very beginning: understanding what the FHA means by public use, common use, and private residential space.

This blog reflects how I approach these classifications in the field during Fair Housing inspections and plan reviews, and it also reflects the consistent method we use at ACI. Because the FHA is not written like a prescriptive building code, interpretation is part of the process. In my experience, getting the interpretation right early is one of the most effective ways to reduce risk and avoid costly corrections.

Why This Distinction Exists in Fair Housing Accessibility

The FHA’s design and construction requirements are intended to ensure equal access for people with disabilities across multifamily housing. The Fair Housing Design Manual organizes the built environment into three major categories:

  • Public use areas

  • Common use areas

  • Private dwelling units, where five of the seven FHA design requirements apply

These terms appear straightforward, but in practice, they are some of the most frequently misunderstood parts of any Fair Housing Review. Misinterpretation often begins when teams rely on everyday definitions instead of FHA intent.

Clarity at the outset prevents many of the disputes and redesigns I see later in development.

ACI’s Interpretation of What the FHA Design Manual Intends

The Design Manual uses “public and common use” repeatedly, but it does not always define them with real-world clarity. Below is the approach that consistently proves reliable during our Fair Housing inspections and reviews.

Close-up of a restroom sign labeled ‘104 Restrooms’ with tactile characters and Braille, mounted on a white wall near an interior door.

Public Use Areas

Public use areas are spaces where members of the public may enter while interacting with the property. Frequency does not matter. Restricted access does not matter. A gate, keypad, or appointment system does not change the classification.

If prospects or members of the public are expected to enter the space, it is public use.

Examples include:

  • Leasing offices

  • Model units

  • Public paths leading to leasing

  • Visitor parking

  • Any entrance used by prospects or tours

Teams often assume that a gated community is “not public.” The FHA focuses on expected interaction, not how a door is locked.

Outdoor common-use grilling station at a multifamily community. Features built-in grills, sinks, counters, overhead lighting, and rubber mats along the walkway.

Common Use Areas

Common use areas are shared by residents. If more than one resident uses the space, it is common use. Controlled access does not alter the category.

Common examples include:

  • Mail centers

  • Trash rooms

  • Clubhouses

  • Fitness centers

  • Pools

  • Amenity paths

  • Resident parking

A frequent mistake is assuming that “shared, but controlled access” equals private. The FHA does not interpret it that way. Function always determines classification.

Private Residential Areas

Private residential areas are the spaces intended for the use of a single resident. These areas are not classified as public use or common use. Examples include private garages, individual patios, and private storage rooms.

Private dwelling units themselves are subject to five FHA design requirements, including:

  • Interior accessible route

  • Door usability

  • Reach ranges

  • Bathroom reinforcement

  • Usable kitchens and bathrooms

Exterior private spaces like patios do not need to be accessible, but the route inside the dwelling unit leading to them must comply.

This nuance is often missed in both design reviews and Fair Housing inspections.

Where Misinterpretation Happens Most Often

Multifamily development site plan marked with red circles and arrows.

Across hundreds of Fair Housing reviews, the same issues appear repeatedly. These stem from applying everyday logic to terms that have very specific meanings under the FHA.

Leasing Office Entrances

If an entrance is used by prospects or residents, it must be treated as accessible. Intent is irrelevant if actual use differs.

Inside the Leasing Office

Even when the leasing office is not inside a covered multifamily building, the public areas within it remain subject to accessibility expectations. This includes:

  • Lobbies

  • Conference rooms

  • Public restrooms

  • Any service area used by prospects

Mail Centers

Mail centers are always common use, even when located in standalone kiosks or small buildings. Reach ranges and clear floor spaces must be included in Fair Housing design.

Parking Areas

Misclassification here is common:

  • Visitor parking = public use

  • Resident parking = common use

Failing to designate public-use parking near leasing areas is a frequent Fair Housing Review finding.

Pools and Clubhouses

If residents share it, it is common use.
If prospects are shown the space, it is temporarily public use.

Either way, accessibility applies.

Amenity Paths and Outdoor Features

Dog parks, trails, grilling stations, and outdoor fitness equipment all fall under common use when shared by residents.

Private Patios and Balconies

The balcony itself is private.
The interior route to it must still comply with FHA design requirements.

Corridors and Breezeways

These are common use circulation paths. Accessible route requirements apply throughout.

Trash Rooms and Package Rooms

Shared = common use
Monitored or access-controlled does not make them private.

Why Accurate Classification Matters

Getting public, common, and private classifications right at the beginning of a Fair Housing Review makes the rest of the project more predictable and reduces costly changes later.

Testers Focus on Public Use Areas First

Testing activity typically begins at:

  • Leasing paths

  • Public-use parking

  • Entrances

  • Model units

  • Routes used on tours

If these areas were misclassified during design, the project becomes immediately vulnerable to a complaint.

Corrections Are Expensive After Construction

Typical corrections resulting from misclassification include:

  • Regrading sidewalks

  • Reconfiguring parking or mail centers

  • Adjusting slopes at entrances

  • Installing new accessible routes

  • Rebuilding landings

Exterior work is especially costly due to its connection to grades, drainage, and elevations.

Lenders and Buyers Are Increasing Accessibility Scrutiny

Fair Housing compliance is now a common part of:

  • Acquisitions

  • Refinancing

  • Equity reviews

  • Property condition assessments

Correct classifications early protect owners during due diligence.

Design Teams Depend on Accurate Classification

Civil, architectural, MEP, and landscape teams all rely on these initial determinations. Misclassification leads to conflicting drawings, incorrect slopes, and missing accessible routes.

Contractors Build What Is Shown

Contractors build what is detailed in the drawings. If a space is misclassified on the plans, the constructed condition will reflect that same assumption. Contractors cannot be expected to infer accessibility requirements that were never documented

The Owner Retains Long-Term Exposure

Even after occupancy, classification errors can surface through:

  • Complaints

  • Testing

  • Renovations

  • Refinancing

  • Management transitions

Correct classification from day one reduces long-term operational risk.

How We Approach It at ACI

At ACI, our Fair Housing reviews focus on clarity, defensible interpretation, and the real-world use of the property. Rather than treating FHA terminology as abstract, we evaluate each space based on expected function.

Function Determines Classification

  • Prospects use the space = public use

  • Residents share it = common use

  • One resident uses it = private

Real-World Use Matters More Than Notes on a Sheet

If residents or staff use a route differently than intended in the drawings, FHA interpretation follows actual use.

The Five Internal FHA Requirements Are Non-Negotiable

We evaluate every covered unit for:

  • Door usability

  • Accessible route

  • Reach ranges

  • Bathroom reinforcement

  • Usable kitchen and bathroom layouts

We Review Drawings as a Connected System

We examine:

  • Elevations

  • Slopes

  • Parking relationships

  • Walks

  • Amenity access

  • Building entries

FHA issues appear where disciplines intersect.

We Favor Conservative, Defensible Interpretation

If a space could reasonably be public or common use, we treat it accordingly.

Our Process Focuses on Long-Term Risk Management

We evaluate how decisions today will perform:

  • During construction

  • During occupancy

  • During testing

  • During resale or refinancing

Durability matters.

Final Thoughts

Understanding how the FHA classifies public use, common use, and private residential areas is one of the foundational steps in Fair Housing compliance. These distinctions guide how routes are planned, how amenities are accessed, and how teams coordinate across disciplines.

Most confusion does not come from bad design. It comes from reasonable assumptions that do not match how the FHA Design Manual defines space. With consistent interpretation and clarity at the start, teams reduce risk and achieve smoother outcomes during construction, inspections, and occupancy.

If your team needs assistance interpreting these classifications or aligning design decisions with Fair Housing accessibility requirements, ACI is available to help.

Clear classifications lead to better coordination, fewer surprises, and a more efficient path through Fair Housing compliance.

Disclaimer: This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Accessibility requirements vary by jurisdiction. Always consult federal, state, and local regulations and licensed professionals to ensure compliance.

Previous
Previous

November Newsletter Topics

Next
Next

Why is it Important for a Company to Remain ADA Compliant?